Von den mannigfachen Ausdrücken der „intentionalen Inexistenz“ bei Franz Brentano

Abstract In this article I provide an overview of the many different terms that Brentano sometimes uses as synonyms or explanations for “intentional inexistence”. The associated with intentional inexistence appear in contexts, and we can conclude these primarily to describe a property is accidental dependent on subject from which it arises passes away. Ontologically, both properties substances exist, but former requires substance (the subject) its existence. A mental act be considered first-order property, whereas content (or part act) understood accident accident.